Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1d4Con


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:41, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

1d4Con

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage by reliable and independent sources. Esw01407 (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I created the article because I thought it would be nice to have a wiki page for my convention to help raise awareness. There isn't any coverage, because last year we wanted to start small. We didn't have any media coverage and outside of Facebook and Google+, the only place for information is the website I created, sited in the article. I sincerely hope that you don't delete my article because there isn't any media coverage for it. I made the post to help spread awareness about my idea. I love wikipedia and this is my first contribution, I don't know all of the rules, but I was hoping making this very real event would be harmless, especially when I'm planning another event for next year. Amvteknoboy (talk) 13:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Good luck with your convention. But, Wikipedia is not for promotion.  If the con grows in the future and attracts the coverage in reliable sources to establish notability, then would be the time for an article to be created. -- Whpq (talk) 21:40, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. While a Wikipedia can help to raise awareness, that's not its purpose. It's kind of the other way around: Wikipedia covers articles in some proportion to a subject's existing significance. Get some coverage in local newspapers, noteworthy blogs/websites, etc. and you'll have an easier time. In the meantime you might want to copy the existing content to your user space (see WP:Userfication). --Rhododendrites (talk) 13:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for the tip. Amvteknoboy (talk) 10:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.