Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Carabinier Regiment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 19:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

1st Carabinier Regiment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

nearly empty, unsourced article. Not enough info present to determine notability The Banner talk 22:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  23:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  23:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep This Napoleonic regiment is discussed in an English language book called Napoleon's Cuirassiers and Carabiniers. There is a strong presumption that far more sources exist in French. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Regiments are invariably notable and French Napoleonic regiments will undoubtedly have sources and are therefore verifiable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per reasons given by the preceding editors. Kansiime   (talk)  06:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cullen32 and Necrothesp regiments in particular French Napoleonic regiments are notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * A near empty article? The Banner talk 00:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:STUB. Perfectly acceptable. Can clearly be expanded. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.