Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Lt Harry Sutton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shimeru (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

1st Lt Harry Sutton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article does not meet WP:BIO requirements. A Google search confirms that Sutton's notability rests on an isolated incident that had no particular impact on a larger military conflict. Warrah (talk) 12:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - for a military bio to be notable based on awards, it would have to be for the award of the Medal of Honor or multiple awards of the Distinguished Service Cross (United States). See WP:MILPEOPLE. (GregJackP (talk) 14:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I had a search around and the best I could find was this . I don't believe that this satisfies WP:GNG or WP:N. In terms of military personnel it doesn't satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE. If the creator can provide a few more sources and provide a positive statement as to what sets this officer apart, then I would consider changing my opinion but as it stands I don't believe the subject meets the current requirements for an article. — AustralianRupert (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.