Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1videoConference


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

1videoConference

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Open source software of marginal notability. Currently appears to fail WP:N as the only third-party coverage is a write up on the techcrunch blog. Prod removed with comment "Don't delete because (a) multipoint video is coming of age, and (b) this is going into live beta as 'vmutki' shortly." Jfire (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. 36,000 Google hits, more third-party coverage than nominator describes. --Oldak Quill 01:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination if you can provide some examples of substantial third party coverage. Ghits are not a reliable measure of notability. Jfire (talk) 01:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I spent a while looking for sources to add but I really couldn't find much - despite having a lot of google hits, they all seem to be forum/blog posts, or links and mirrors of the techcrunch article.  Pirate  Mink  12:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete As proder, I couldn't find any sources. BJ Talk 11:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless it is already in widespread use, it is not notable. Shootthedevgru (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - another "this is gonna be big soon, man!" with no "sources" but techcrunch - -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  17:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.