Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2-3-1-9


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

2-3-1-9

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Term with a passing mention in a movie. No coverage in reliable sources or indication that it has lasting significance. Not a useful redirect term to the movie, either. —C.Fred (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is a two-sentence article about a phrase used in the film Monsters, Inc. which is cited only to "Multiple viewings of the Pixar movie Monsters, Inc." There's nothing here that suggests that this is a topic worthy of an article of its own. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * KEEEEEEEP 2-3-1-9 really holds the key to the meaning of life. 161.113.20.135 (talk) 15:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete This phrase is obviously not notable enough to warrant its own pointless article.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 23:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I thought about a speedy, but there's not a category it really fits into. —C.Fred (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia isn't the Urban Dictionary per WP:NOTDICMduvekot (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. As the nom says, this wouldn't even be useful as a redirect.  Google results turn up  nothing useful. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: We could probably snow close this since I don't see how it'd end any differently if we waited the full week. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.