Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000 Gelsor Open Romania – Singles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

2000 Gelsor Open Romania – Singles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two sentence article with a lot of stats, referenced to a primary source. Appears to fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. - MrX 20:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - What about: 2001 Gelsor Open Romania – Singles, 2002 Open Romania – Singles, 2003 BCR Open Romania – Singles, 2007 BCR Open Romania – Singles, 2008 BCR Open Romania – Singles, 2009 BCR Open Romania – Singles, 2010 BCR Open Romania – Singles, 2011 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2012 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2013 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2014 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2015 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles, 2016 BRD Năstase Țiriac Trophy – Singles? They should be also deleted? And all the singles draws for ATP and WTA tournaments? I think having an article with the main draw of an important ATP Tour event is an valuable piece of encyclopedic material. Is not Wikipedia an Encyclopedia? Or am I wrong? ( G a b i n h o >:) 07:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Main draw articles for ATP Tennis Tournaments are notable. Smartyllama (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The article has only statistical information and like the nominator points out this isn't a stats website. 204.187.67.27 (talk) 16:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom, needs more GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * So of all the thousands of similar articles, this, and only this, is not notable? Or they should all be deleted? If the latter, stealthily picking them off one by one isn't the solution, establishing consensus through an RfC is. If the former, what is the need to target this instead of the others? Smartyllama (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - To the two people so far that said delete, let me ask you this, if this is deleted then what about the similiar articles that resemble this like the WTA International or ATP World Tour 250. If this was a low ranked tournament (ITF under 25k) then I would agree but as this is an ATP tournament then this is a keep in my books. Matt294069 is coming 02:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Tournament was part of the highest professional level in men's tennis, the ATP Tour. Meets the WP Tennis guidelines ("Any men's tournament is notable if it is part of the ATP World Tour..").--Wolbo (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Wolbo above. This meets notability guidelines pertaining to tennis. Adamtt9 (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - the WP:OSE arguments aside, it is/was (notability is not temporary) a tournament on the ATP tour. While it's a poor article, should be retained and improved by a tennis fan.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:01, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.