Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 Salt Lake County Council election


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No objection to a re-nomination for more input if a potential merger can't be sorted editorially. Star  Mississippi  01:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

2002 Salt Lake County Council election

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Municipal election, routine event with routine local coverage. WP is not Ballotpedia and is not a database of all elections. MB 00:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: One last week to see if consensus can emerge here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Utah. MB 00:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: For now, and try to find a way to merge and condense all the information on these elections. Not worth a standalone article, but deletion is not the best answer.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge into what? Kevin McE (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. If you think these are a violation of what Wikipedia is not, perhaps we need a discussion or RFC regarding all the articles in all the subcategories of Category:Local elections in the United States by state or territory, Category:English local elections by year, and any other similar categories applicable to other countries. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 20:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely what Wikipedia is not. Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.