Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003–04 Canadian network television schedule


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 14:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

2003–04 Canadian network television schedule

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced list that fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 13:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. If we have 2003–04 United States network television schedule, I don't see the problem with having its Canadian counterpart. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Every article is judged on its own merits. The Banner talk 11:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The merits of this being different from the merits of that...how, exactly? Content? The same. Quality of sourcing? The same. Difference? Crickets. Bearcat (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  17:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. There may be a legitimate case to be made that we shouldn't keep any such articles at all, but there's no good reason to single out Canadian ones as somehow less inherently notable or more inherently "advertorial" than comparable USian articles that are being kept. I might be inclined to support a comprehensive and well-reasoned argument that we should delete all of these including the USian ones per WP:NOTTVGUIDE, but I'm definitely not willing to support singling out the Canadian ones for unique treatment not being extended to the USian versions of the exact same thing. Bearcat (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.