Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003 Oricon Top 100 Singles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 02:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

2003 Oricon Top 100 Singles
I don't see why Wikipedia needs articles about music charts. This is unencyclopedic, though an inclusionist, many of these article needs to go. This articles are nuisance to Wikipedia. Terence Ong Talk 11:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete --Terence Ong Talk 11:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article does not qualify for any speedy criteria.


 * Keep, like Hot 100 No. 1 Hits of 2005 (USA). A good way for readers to find articles about notable Japanese musicians and songs. Kappa 17:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Scoo 19:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 00:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. We need more coverage of Japanese pop music. -- JJay 00:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa, both here and at AfD: 2005 Oricon Top 100 Singles --Qirex 11:52, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. Not every top 100 needs its own article. Create one article with information on several similar charts and include links to the artists mentioned.  - MB (Talk)  11:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa. Merging all the Oricon charts would make the article extremely long. -- ReyBrujo 20:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa. This is a good resource for single sells.
 * keep. this information is very useful to people interested in music charts. Kingturtle 09:12, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.