Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004–05 ABN-AMRO Twenty-20 Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  →TSU tp* 06:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

2004–05 ABN-AMRO Twenty-20 Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Created in October 2011 and left in stub state since. No substantial improvement to the information provided in Twenty-20 Cup. No indication of WP:N. SocietyBox (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the above reasons:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Official tournament sanctioned by the Pakistan Cricket Board and played with official Twenty20 status - the highest level of domestic cricket in Pakistan. These tournaments should all have seperate articles as they are all notable in their own right - unfortunately this wikiproject is mostly an Anglo/Australian effort, so our coverage of Asian domestic cricket is somewhat neglected. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 22:24, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. They may be recreated when someone decides to properly research and write them. The nomination was based on the articles' current state. --SocietyBox (talk) 02:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. See WP:RUBBISH. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I was suggesting a reason closer to WP:A3 and not WP: RUBBISH. --SocietyBox (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep border-line cases I think, but the idea of stubs are articles that can be expanded, and these all provide enough information to enable expansions, while still having a use at the moment (they generally list the teams taking part, and the winner of the tournament, along with a few other key details in some).  Harrias  talk 21:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: per systematic bias pointed out by Howzat?Out!Out!Out and because this can be significantly improved on the current content. -- lTopGunl (talk) 02:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Howzat.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 03:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.