Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004–2009


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Due to the lack of sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 15:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

2004–2009

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable compilation, no sources  Jay Jay Talk to me 01:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Weak keep. It is notable. Just highly unsourced. Farine (talk) 05:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * How is notable if there are no sources to support that claim.  Jay Jay Talk to me 01:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

 Delete as sources don't seem to exist. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  01:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This compilation album does exist UNFD store. But yes if we are going to keep it, it does indeed need more sources. — ıʇɐʞǝɐdʌɐиƭɐqǝoɟʎouɹqoɐʇ [✉] 22:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete. No sources that establishes notability. If the creator or other contributors want the article kept they need to do some work - but this is not a new article. --Tuzapicabit (talk) 12:43, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.