Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Australian Greens candidates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete and redirect. Pastordavid (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

2004 Australian Greens candidates

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

All of this information is already provided at Candidates of the Australian federal election, 2004, with the exception of the totals polled, which can be seen on the pages of the electorates. There is little practical value to any of the rest of the article. Frickeg (talk) 08:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Timeshift (talk) 08:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete/redirect. Article was superseded with the creation of the broader candidates article; should be redirected. Rebecca (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article provides useful grouping of candidates by party aggregated with results (including top 25 seats) that is not available in Candidates of the Australian federal election, 2004 or elsewhere in this format Peter Campbell 10:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ditto Peter Campbell's argument, but perhaps some compression could occur. Chrismaltby (talk) 12:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   —Euryalus (talk) 09:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as everything's on the rest of Wikipedia. Auroranorth (!) 13:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect Information is contained in the candidates article. Merge any relevant information there. Twenty Years 15:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Grouping of information in this manner is useful --Kieran Bennett (talk) 21:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete/redirect per nom, Rebecca and TY. Orderinchaos 23:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 *  Delete Redirect to Candidates of the Australian federal election, 2004 - for reasons of notability and specifically WP:NOT. The notable material from this article can be found at the more comprehensive "All 2004 Candidates" piece. The remainder is a list of statistics with too little context to explain why they are worth recording. A Greens vote percentage is noteworthy if it a) is large (eg Sydney or Grayndler) or b) could potentially affect the outcome (eg Richmond or Wentworth). Outside of these, an article that indicates that candidate A got 4.76% of the vote and candidate B got 4.47% and neither affected the outcome in their seat is fairly indiscriminate. Euryalus (talk) 23:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, duplication of stuff elsewhere. &mdash;Moondyne 01:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Candidates of the Australian federal election, 2004 where people can see who the candidates were for the Greens and the other parties. Capitalistroadster (talk) 01:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Either redirect as per Euryalus, or rename article to something like "List of Greens candidates at the 2004 Australian Federal Election". Lankiveil (talk) 09:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Redirect as per suggestion of Euryalus Xdenizen (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.