Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Hito Top 100 Singles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

2004 Hito Top 100 Singles

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural nomination, article proposed for deletion after previously having prod contested.

Reason for proposed deletion was "no sources, no context"

Previous reason for contesting deletion was "Fix not destroy"

Hope this helps, Taelus (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep WP:SOFIXIT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.188.242.125 (talk) 18:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment&mdash;This list doesn't bother to explain what it is about. But, based upon the introduction to a similar list 2005 Hito Top 100 Singles, it appears to be the product of a radio station, Hit Fm Taiwan. The importance of the list is unclear.&mdash;RJH (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero sources. If this is some radio station's list of top 100 songs, it's hardly notable and there is nothing to indicate any kind of significance. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Lists by individual radio stations aren't notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 05:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.