Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Los Angeles Lakers

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:44, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

2004 Los Angeles Lakers
This seems like something from a newspaper or something?. Nothing but an opinion. If it is good enough to stay why is it not on the Los Angeles Lakers page? Why a whole new 2004 page? Twthmoses 16:26, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; It reads like an editorial piece. Pure PoV. &mdash; RJH 19:43, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.  We have an article on the Los Angeles Lakers.  I don't see a need for a separate article on each season, and if we did, this wouldn't be it. --BM 21:06, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV duplication. Megan1967 23:20, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, PoV fork. Wyss 02:29, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreement with everything said previous. Tygar 04:01, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concure with everyone else. Sounds like someone else's work.Saopaulo1 08:04, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV rant - David Gerard 18:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.