Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005–06 Dagenham & Redbridge F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

2005–06 Dagenham &

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence that these seasons meet the general notability guidelines. Though well referenced, these are run of the mill newspaper sports reporting, which WP:GNG states is not sufficient to establish notability. Other AfDs have established a strong consensus that seasons in non fully professional leagues - such as the Conference in which the teams competed in these seasons are not inherently notable. Note that the the articles for Dagenham and Redbridge's two prior seasons were recently deleted Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because it is for a club in the same league, with fewer references, and nothing suggesting that it meets the WP:GNG


 * Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 20:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both We need to have a cut-off somewhere and consensus is that these fail WP:NSEASONS. Multiple AfDs on club seasons in the same league have resulted in deletion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 compared with three or four that ended as no consensus (one of which was deleted at the second AfD) and none as keep as far as I'm aware. Number   5  7  09:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  15:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete both; they both fail WP:GNG as there is no non-routine sourcing. -  Yellow Dingo &#160; (talk)  01:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete both - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 08:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete both - as per argument provided by Number 57 Spiderone  07:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete both - there is clear consensus that the fifth tier of English football is not sufficiently high to fulfill WP:NSEASONS "top professional leagues" requirement. Fenix down (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.