Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006-07 NHL season

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. CSTAR 01:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

2006-07 NHL season
Delete, speculation about a future season before even the season before it started, this information more pertains to the 2005-06 NHL season then the next one. And said information could be said about every other forthcoming season as well, considering the current state of the league, but i don't see a rush to write articles for the 2007-08 NHL season or the 2008-09 NHL season. Also considering that the future of the league as a whole has yet to be determined, as their could possibly be no NHL in for the 2006-07. --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:52, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a fortune teller. Megan1967 05:18, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Premature, and any information relating to the next season being jeopardized by the strike can be discussed in the 2004-2005 season article, though by the look of the red link above, there doesn't appear to be one. 23skidoo 06:17, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Fixed link. There's nothing on that page either, but it has more scope for expansion. sjorford &rarr;&bull;&larr; 10:56, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's possible to write an encyclopedic article about a future event, but only if there's anything that can be said about it. That doesn't seem to be the case here; what can you say about a sports season that won't happen for a year and a half without pure speculation? /s&#618;zl&#230;k  &#762;/  07:10, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I predict this article will be deleted. Jayjg (talk) 21:05, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Duplicates info in the 2005-06 article. If there was anything unique to be said, I'd be all for keeping it. – flamurai (t) 16:42, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)