Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 NCAA Division I-A football season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 12:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

2006 NCAA Division I-A football season
Not an encyclopedic topic. This is just the editor's opinions on what will and won't matter in the upcoming season, in other words a crystalball. Metros232 20:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystal ball with no prejudice against later recreation as an encyclopedic article. BryanG(talk) 20:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per BryanG; recreate later &mdash;  ßott e  siηi  (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Keep and cleanup Per SorryGuy. The second paragraph needs to go or reworded to be neutral.  Cheers.  --Starionwolf 21:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Wikipedia is a Non-Prophet organization. -- D -Day What up? Am I cool, or what? 22:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per BryanG. Ande B 22:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean-up. The second paragraph and the key match-ups is POV and crystal ball but the lead sentence and list of bowl games, their dates, and the networks which will be airing them should remain as it is encyclopedic. Sorry Guy 00:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sorry and the fact that there is an article entitled 2007-08 NHL season  hoopydink  Conas tá tú? 01:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. What a mess. But there are verifiable details of the 2006 season that could be documented here. ScottW 17:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep By no means is it premature. Osomec 18:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per SorryGuy assuming the POV sections are removed. -Big Smooth 22:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.