Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Raw Results


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 13:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

2006_Raw_Results
Page has no content, no meaning and makes no sense. I honestly don't even know what it's supposed to be about. Jscarle 04:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It refers to results for RAW, but it's so poorly designed and laid out that it's worthless.  There's a link on the RAW page to a site outside of WP for results, and if somebody cares about enough maybe they could add it here, but this page right now is completely worthless.  --fuzzy510 05:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if it was better designed, it would still be worthless. It's not nonsense, but it is crap. -- Kicking222 05:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poorly written, article does not effectively describe contents (My first thought was "Who's putting their raw research data on Wikipedia?") and appears to be much better handled by at least one of the external links, as per Fuzzy. -- saberwyn 11:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Provides no context. A link in the main article will do. Author is unlikely to return to fix it. - Mgm|(talk) 11:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.