Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 United Kingdom budget


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Never usually close so early but articles like these are always kept and so they should be (and I say that as a reader not a British citizen!) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

2006 United Kingdom budget

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe this is a topic notable enough to have it's own article. Music1201 (talk) 07:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: I've fixed (in particular) the infobox. The page is one of a series -- 2011 United Kingdom budget or 2012 United Kingdom budget gives a some indication of what the page could be. UK budgets are a significant annual economic event, get worldwide news coverage as well as ample general national UK coverage. Examples for 2006 include The Guardian and the BBC. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:39, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs work, not deletion. A cursory search on Google for 2006 UK budget etc shows that broad independent coverage exists. — Nizolan  (talk) 10:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. All national budgets of major jurisdictions meet GNG in my experience. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * There are provincial budgets here that I daresay would, too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I agree that major legislation like this passes WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.