Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 1. FFC Turbine Potsdam season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

2007–08 1. FFC Turbine Potsdam season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following similar women's club season articles:











General consensus states that all football club season articles should be about a professional football season to be considered notable. Fully professional leagues are listed at WP:FPL. All these women football clubs are in the Bundesliga (women), which is listed on WP:FPL under "top level leagues which are not fully professional", and therefore not notable, per WP:NSEASONS. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  12:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete there is nothing in any of these articles that seems to satisfy the general notability guidelines. Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 12:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Inherently erroneous nomination rationale. WP:FPL is completely unassociated with WP:NSEASONS. WP:FPL is used in assessing the notability of players. WP:NSEASONS specifically refers only to "top professional leagues", there is no requirement for leagues to be "fully" professional. All these seasons relate to club's playing at the highest level of football in Germany and are therefore notable per NSEASONS. Fenix down (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The league is semi-professional, and WP:NSEASONS states that only top professional leagues are always notable. Just because a team is in the top flight of their country does not mean an article would pass WP:NSEASONS. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I see nothing to confirm that the league is semi-professional here. However, if there is a degree of professionalism as you have noted, plus the league is the highest level in its country then it meets NSEASONS. It is the most successful league in Europe for CL winners, and therefore one of the most important at a continental level, so I think it is fair to describe it as a top professional league for the purpose of NSEASONS. Fenix down (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I only mentioned WP:FPL because of the reference it used, which states "whilst the Women's Bundesliga has a structure similar to the fully professional men's league, it uses a semi-professional model. Most players for the Women's Bundesliga must have a second source of income". I understood WP:NSEASONS to include only professional leagues, but I could be wrong. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 13:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all; they all fail WP:GNG as there is no non-routine coverage on these topics. -  Yellow Dingo &#160; (talk)  02:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all - not a fully pro league as has already been confirmed Spiderone  06:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.