Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 Omani League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

2007–08 Omani League

 * – ( View AfD View log )

without content (this table may be useful on wikisource - I am not sure) Bulwersator (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I dunno - we've got several articles for this league's various seasons. 2008-09 Omani League is just like this article, devoid of any content but the stats. 2009–10 Omani League is a much better example, though, with a proper lead and everything. The league itself is unquestionably notable as the top-tier national league for the Oman Football Association. The various season articles, at least from where I'm sitting, are extensions of the league's article, as if they were FORK'ed out as they happen. Many leagues do the same. Let me ask this, if we added a Lead and proper references (or at least something for the table), would that be sufficient to keep? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * IMHO yes Bulwersator (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have added a reference to this season and also to the aforementioned following season. Cloudz 679 12:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Cloudz 679 12:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reference, and the fact that we've now added a proper lead and wikiformatting. I think this one is in good shape. 2008–09 Omani League, on the other hand... yikes. But that's another story... UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep now. All preceding years are copied 1:1 from RSSSF. -Koppapa (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - article needs improving (well done so far by the way), not deleting. GiantSnowman 14:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.