Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 New Hampshire General Court Session


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. GRBerry 20:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

2007 New Hampshire General Court Session
Violation of WP:NOT Delete This is a Secret account 16:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

*Keep. The article could use some work but it certainly does not fail WP:NOT, at least not under any understanding I have. The material herein is possibly very useful to a user and cannot be easily merged into another article. JodyBtalk 18:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article fails WP:NOT 2.9.4 and does not seem to convey anything meaningful to the general reader -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 17:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  17:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  17:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Provisional delete: The article as written doesn't even explain what it's about. It's possible that I may change to keep if both context and a claim to notability are added; both are currently lacking. Sarcasticidealist 20:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep how douse listing the members of the New Hampshire legislature fall under WP:NOT it douse not have an faq, Plot summarie, Lyrics, or Statistics, it seems that your main argument is that since "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" you can discriminate against information you don't like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.186.40.211 (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That isn't a list of all the members, it's how they voted on two laws, that's stats right there. This is a Secret account 15:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As much as I hate to get rid of something that mentions Jeff Fontas (he's a buddy of mine that goes to school with me), this definitely fails WP:NOT. GlassCobra 06:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is only about two votes on a report. I misread it above. JodyBtalk 18:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I had to look quite hard to find that this was the NH legislature. The article might be converted to a proper list, with the names linked to articles on those concerned.  However we already have categories for NH senators and NH representatives.  These do not distinguish theose of the 2007 session from earlier ones, but the recent consensus has been against categories for "current senators" etc. because the categories become obsolete.  I do not know whether all members of the General Court have (or even need) articles, but there might be merit in conversion to a proper list.  In any event the voting columns need to be explained, and a brief introductory text provided.  Peterkingiron (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.