Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Puchuncaví earthquake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Seismicity of the Chilean coast. ‑Scottywong | comment _ 23:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

2007 Puchuncaví earthquake

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable earthquake; it had no lasting consequences. Lester Foster (talk &#124; talk) 18:43, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Discussion


 * Delete - Having an easier time finding at least one source for this one. It's quite good and could be used to expand this article a bit, maybe even up to start class. But even then, I haven't seen anything that shows there was any significant damage or that there have been any lasting effects. This probably means there weren't any real issues with this except for the minor landslides that's mentioned in the article (no source there though). This earthquake wasn't exactly shallow, at 45 km, and is part of the reason why its effects were apparently minimal. The coast of Chile is literally littered with dozens of M6 and above earthquakes and this one doesn't seem to stand out at all (and probably doesn't meet our notability guidelines), with the exception of this study (where it's referred to as the Michilla earthquake).   Dawnseeker2000   19:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Seismicity of the Chilean coast, preferable to deletion. J04n(talk page) 21:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - If this were a notable earthquake it would already be listed there. Probably not anything to say about this event, even on that article (the noteworthy events already seem to be listed). We're not going to lose anything with this one gone. Dawnseeker2000   21:35, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge into Seismicity of the Chilean coast: the quake itself is not notable since it had no WP:LASTING consequences. The information and sources contained in the article would be useful to support the assertion in the "Seismicity of the Chilean coast" article that the top quakes recorded in Chile occurred in two distinct periods. This quake falls exactly within one of those distinct periods: 2004&mdash;2011. -    &#x0288;  u coxn \ talk 22:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JmaJeremy  ✆  ✎  13:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable WP:NOTLAST. If any editor thinks it relevant to the article above they should go ahead an add it DavidTTTaylor (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.