Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008-2009 ACB season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 09:36, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

2008-2009 ACB season

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not sure it's appropriate to call this an "article," but this collection of tables was listed for Proposed deletion in the past for lacking any sort of assertion whatsoever of notability and citations. Prod was struck without explanation, but it seemed an obvious enough case that it attracted the template again, more recently. This random collection of statistics plainly does not warrant retention, especially in its present form. MrZaius talk  15:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - a season article for Spain's top basketball league certainly passes notability. Even more, it's probably one of the top five leagues in the world.  Grsz  11  16:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Grsz11's reasoning for notability. Would you propose deleting 2009 NFL season and 2008–09 NBA season?  Linguist At Large  16:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Season articles for top-level sports leagues have a high level of inherent notability, especially Spain's league, which I believe is one of the top European leagues. As for references, the standard for whether something belongs on Wikipedia is considered to be verifiability, meaning it can be verified. Of course an article on the current Spanish basketball league season can be cited. The fact that it isn't means that it should be tagged for insufficient references, not deleted.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 22:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Grsz. &mdash; neuro(talk) 03:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.