Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Henlopen Conference football season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 16:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

2008 Henlopen Conference football season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Past schedule of high school football conference is not notable. Results are reported in Henlopen Conference.  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 21:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete high schools themselves are normally notable, but high school sports programs normally are not, and even less so for the annual results of a high school conference season. I encourage these enthusiastic editors to try another wiki better suited for the topics.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:56, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note I echo the above comment, try another wiki better suited to these topics. --Adam Kallender (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Paulmcdonald. They've said it - I can't improve it. Peridon (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * NOTE Who have said it cannot be imroved? --Adam Kallender (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Not the article - what TransporterMan and Paulmcdonald said. Peridon (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * 'Keep RS TS are able to be found through other links to support this ARTICLE. --Adam Kallender (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete both - Individual seasons of high school leagues? No.  While WP:NSPORTS doesn't address  leagues specifically, NSPORTS is a reasonable approximation of where we should go with this.   If the coverage is routine and local, then an article is not warranted.  All this one amounts to is a statistical recap. Tarc (talk) 14:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.