Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Pulitzer Prize


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. (non admin close)  D u s t i talk to me 20:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

2008 Pulitzer Prize

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fork of Pulitzer Prize and its many sub-articles. We don't need multiple articles listing the prize winners each year, there is no other article like this for prior years. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 20:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes there is. Speedy keep. Needs to be cleaned up and formatted like the others, but absolutely no reason to delete. Tan   |   39  20:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * What "others"? All the prize winners are listed in sub-articles. For example fiction winners are listed at Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 20:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you or I missing something? 2007 Pulitzer Prize. 2006 Pulitzer Prize. This goes back to 1917 Pulitzer Prize. Why not have 2008? Tan   |   39  20:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Consider:


 * Cleanup obviously needed.-- Kallahan (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh i see I apologize I did not realize there were two parallel lists going. I will detract this AfD since there is no one else that wants it. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to close out an AfD if someone could please speedy close/keep, thanks, sorry for the trouble. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.