Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Luton Town F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  EN  - Jungwon  12:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

2009–10 Luton Town F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NSEASONS as the club as playing non-league football that season. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 11:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 11:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly passes WP:GNG just from the sources in the article. WP:NSEASONS has been used to justify deleting articles which pass WP:GNG in the past even though nothing about WP:NSEASONS is exclusionary. The policy needs a rethink. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes GNG—by a mile—with its 124 references to independent reliable sources. ——  Serial  12:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per GNG. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 12:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NSEASONS. Number   5  7  13:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG as far as I can see. Lots of sources does not mean "significant coverage" - it all appears be ROUTINE/NOTNEWS. GiantSnowman 20:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * How is the coverage any different to 2008–09 Luton Town F.C. season (which would pass WP:NSEASONS)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SportingFlyer (talk • contribs)


 * Keep per WP:GNG. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 20:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG. There was plenty of coverage of this season: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. LTFC 95 (talk) 22:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'm convinced that the sources above add up to a GNG pass. The season did get attention in national papers, for example The Times as well. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.