Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 RB Leipzig season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

2009–10 RB Leipzig season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a team in a professional league. Fails WP:NSEASONS. Kingjeff (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following for deletion:


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 1.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 03:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 05:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 05:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NorthAmerica1000 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Please show me the rule about it on wikipedia. Nikebrand (talk) 15:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

2002–03 Dynamo Dresden season 2001–02 Dynamo Dresden season 2000–01 Dynamo Dresden season1999–2000 Dynamo Dresden season1998–99 Dynamo Dresden season1997–98 Dynamo Dresden season1996–97 Dynamo Dresden season1995–96 Dynamo Dresden season2003–04 Dynamo Dresden season--Nikebrand (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I found it: " Individual seasons

Shortcut: WP:NSEASONS Articles can be created on individual seasons of teams in top professional leagues, as these articles almost always meet the notability requirements. Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. It is strongly recommended that those articles be redirected to the team page if no sourced prose can be created. For college sports teams, weigh both the season itself and the sport (for example, if a US collegiate American football team and a US collegiate fencing team enjoy the same level of success, the football team is likely to receive a significantly greater amount of coverage): '''A national championship season at the top collegiate level is generally notable. A national championship season at a lower collegiate level might be notable''' A season including a post-season appearance (or, if there is no post-season competition, a high final ranking) in the top collegiate level is often notable. For programs considered elite in a sport (e.g., Kentucky, North Carolina, Kansas, in men's basketball; Tennessee and UConn in women's basketball; Michigan, Notre Dame, Alabama, USC in football, etc.) many or all seasons might be notable regardless of the outcome (the amount written by reliable sources on a weekly basis for some of these programs is enough that almost anything or anyone having any relation to them is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline). In cases where the individual season notability is insufficient for an article, multiple seasons may be grouped together in a single article. This grouping might be based on head coaches, conference affiliation, or any other reasonable standard that results in sufficient coverage for the period to warrant an article. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikebrand (talk • contribs) 18:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * "In cases where the individual season notability is insufficient for an article, multiple seasons may be grouped together in a single article" supports a merger, not keeping the individual club season article. Kingjeff (talk) 19:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete all - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 20:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete all Past consensus has been that season articles are only worthwhile for clubs in fully professional leagues, and none of these seasons were spent in such a league. Number   5  7  21:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Per WP:NSEASONS and WP:NOTSTATS. Low level team in non-FPL. Article contains no sourced prose. Fenix down (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete in its current state. Note however that Notability would override all football project guidelines and if somebody cared to search for reliable sources and adequate coverage the articles should be free to be recreated. Given the somewhat controversial nature of RB Leipzig such coverage, online and offline, would surely exist. But it's up to the creator, or anybody else interested in the subject to provide and add those. Calistemon (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Stay - Due the reason that RB Leipzig has been promoted in such a record time era into the 2. Bundesliga. This has never been reached by other teams before. You can ask everybody from the media. The first club which moved from league 4 into the 2nd without pauses. That is German tradition they call it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikebrand (talk • contribs) 18:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * In opposite to Dynamo Dresden which had played many years in the amateur leagues. Imagine they will play in the first Bundesliga the next season? All would say it is the blitz promoter and would increase the interest for the seasons before.--Nikebrand (talk) 18:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You still need to establish that these articles based are notable based on WP:GNG. Kingjeff (talk) 18:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The "Bild" moderator says it here http://www.bild.de/bundesliga/2-liga/saison-2014-2015/spielbericht-rb-leipzig-gegen-vfr-aalen-am-1-Spieltag-36609706.bild.html with the record. --Nikebrand (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You need more than one source. You could take that if it has anything to do with the articles in question. But you need to go to other news outlets like kicker.de and Die Welt and see what they have for the articles in question. Kingjeff (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Nikebrands statement that RB Leipzig is the first-ever club in Germany to march through from the fourth division to the 2. Bundesliga is unsourced and also completely incorrect. VfB Eppingen did the same thing between 1978 and 1980, 34 years before RB Leipzig. Calistemon (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete all - From 2009 to 2013, RB Leipzig played in the Oberliga and Regionalliga which are not considered professional leagues. I think the record or any other facts are not good enough reason to create the season articles. MbahGondrong (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.