Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Florida Atlantic Owls football team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep 2009 and delete 2010. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

2009 Florida Atlantic Owls football team

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am also nominating the following related page because it is a future team season:

Future sports team season. The text in the article could very easily change before the next season. There are no dates associated with the schedule and the article has no references. Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. X96lee15 (talk) 17:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included at CFB. — X96lee15 (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep 2009 -- As per my comments on the recent discussion on the 2009-11 Kansas State season articles, I believe that there is usually enough information in the present season to discuss factors in the following season. For example: recruits for the class of 2009 are making verbals, there are storylines forming for future match-ups ("revenge", etc), etc. I would hold the line on only the immediate next season, with the transition happening after the BCS Title Game, thus advocate Delete 2010. --Bobak (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep 2009 and Delete 2010. Information can be added to 2009 at this point, 2010 is still too far off. KnightLago (talk) 23:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep 2009, delete 2010 for the reasons Bobak stated. We've had this discussion before. JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.