Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Green Bay Packers season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

2009 Green Bay Packers season

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a clear example of crystal balling. 2009 is 2 years away, this article (along with the rest of the 2009 articles/cat) has no need to exist currently. RobJ1981 19:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Possibly Speedy Delete. WP:CRYSTAL. Ab e g92 contribs 19:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as balls made of crystal, not encyclopedic as of yet. Can't be speedied, though: NOT violations don't fall under any of the CSD criteria. Moreschi Request a recording? 20:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and take 2008 Green Bay Packers season with it. Punkmorten 20:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete along with 2008 Green Bay Packers season. Nothing can be said about the seasons and is against Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The page is entirely unneeded.++ aviper2k7 ++ 21:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both 2008 and 2009. Just plain silly. Realkyhick 21:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep because the schedules are known. And besides, they're stubs, as more information can be known, they can be expanded. Keep them. Oh, and along with the 2008 page. Crazy Canadian 21:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both 2008 Green Bay Packers season and 2009 Green Bay Packers Season page. Uneeded, useless. The Phoenix Enforcer  (talk to me)  22:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment if I were to remove the coaches since that is crystal balling, does that help them. Or saying "likely"? I'm trying to preserve them. Thanks Crazy Canadian 23:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. As I stated in the other AFD: nope, it wouldn't help. You are trying to "preserve" them? What's the point of that?  People can easily make the articles when the topic is relevant and not just a crystal ball article. Making them now, and saving them for later really isn't how Wikipedia works. RobJ1981 05:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is completely pointless, it should wait until 2009 is closer. Useight 04:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.