Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Manaus Aerotáxi crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (WP:Non-admin closure) Bruddersohn (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

2009 Manaus Aerotáxi crash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

lack of notability. Generally light aircraft are only notable if one of the caualties is notable in their own right, or major collateral damage was caused, or regulations or procedures are changed as a direct result of the incident Petebutt (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. With only a handful of casualties I'd agree, but here 24 people died, which is hardly an insignificant number. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I think the article does meet WP:GNG (significant coverage by independent sources) and WP:NTEMP. Just my opinion. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to pass WP:GNG, and 24 deaths in a single accident is a notable toll. The aircraft does not fit my personal thoughts of a "light aircraft", but that isn't really relevant. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.