Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Maqadna Mosque strike


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per obvious consensus, or merge if anyone feels inclined and is bold enough to do so. (WP:NAC) flaminglawyerc 23:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

2009 Maqadna Mosque strike

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There does not seem to be a reason for this page. Everything can be placed on the main conflict page, and a one paragraph page is not necessary. Yossiea (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Strong keep 1) The main conflict page is already too long. 2) Details will be added to this article when they become available. 3) Military attacks on civilians are notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trachys (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC) It would help if this page, or the conflict page, had news articles that showed Hamas was using mosques in a military fashion. Otherwise, this can be a POV article as well.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.   -- Yossiea (talk)  16:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.   -- Yossiea (talk)  16:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep--Events occurred on January 3, 2009 (WP:No deadline). Let's wait until we can figure out the international ramifications of this military strike against civilians.--Jmundo (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The sources of this article are from the BBC and The Guardian. This was a military strike on a mosque covered by the international media, 1. If this is a case of POV, it can be fix by editing not deletion. I'm sure you can find sources. --Jmundo (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge. I don't see any benefits to readers to breaking out this short paragraph. --Delirium (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions.   —Jmundo (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and perhaps delete, if this event is not seen to have an impact of the current fighting. Recentism. The mosque itself does not seem to be notable and this is only one event of many of this conflict. Delete does not belittle the deaths of non-combattant civilians. Perhaps if a page showing the notability of this mosque might add something or not. --Shuki (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * merge terrible tragedy, very sad. Info should be in the article on this conflict if not there already.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It seems like one of the battles of the conflicts, important. 98.119.177.171 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Don't articles on wars and conflicts have sub-articles on specific incidents/battles? It is small, yes, but it could certainly be expanded. There is no justification for this article's deletion. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Was there any far-reaching effect of this incident? Has notability for this attack been established. Because this incident occured during conflict, something has to distinguish it from other strikes. Chesdovi (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.