Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Midwest Blizzard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to 2009 North American Christmas blizzard. Liz Read! Talk! 19:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

2009 Midwest Blizzard

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Long lost and forgotten article that only has a single source and other than meteorological information, the article does not really state what impact the storm had to satisfy WP:NOTABILITY. Noah Talk 16:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Greenland, Canada,  and United States of America.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep (“long last and forgotten” is not a reason for deletion.) A WP:BEFORE shows a range of coverage New York Times, well sourced article, short 2009 description. With the damage and deaths it meets WP:LASTING. 109.37.150.153 (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge into 2009 North American Christmas blizzard, which appears to be the same storm.152.179.246.14 (talk) 10:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to 2009 North American Christmas blizzard per the above. The keep !vote cites 3 sources but two of these are primary and the other just a list. However the merge target has a couple more secondary sources. I expect that one would be kept if taken to AfD. However this one appears to be an inadvertent CFORK. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to 2009 North American Christmas blizzard per the above. ++Lar: t/c 14:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to 2009 North American Christmas blizzard.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.