Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Toronto blackout


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 05:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

2009 Toronto blackout

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Per WP:NOTNEWS - this blackout had no notable lasting effect such as the Northeast Blackout of 2003 did. –xenotalk 00:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article previously deleted. Does not meet Notability guidelines.eja2k 00:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just as a point-of-order it was deleted as a prod (and the re-creation could be considered a "contesting of the prod"), so that doesn't really have too much relevance. –xenotalk 00:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. One might hope that Toronto Hydro and Hydro One took steps to make their networks more reliable as a result of this blackout, but I cannot find documentation of this. One might also hope that people in Toronto learned to take precautions against a possible future blackout, but most people probably didn't. But it did affect a lot of people who worked or lived in the affected area. -  Eastmain (talk • contribs • count ) 02:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  -  Eastmain (talk • contribs • count ) 02:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's WP:NOTNEWS for Wikipedia. The 2003 one was, however summer's over. ConCompS talk review 02:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —DoRD (talk) 02:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This was a minor blackout--I live in Toronto and it was a nuisance, but hardly worthy of an article. The 2003 blackout on the other hand was significant and obviously goes beyond WP:NOTNEWS.  freshacconci  talk talk  03:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.