Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 Albion Rovers F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

2010–11 Albion Rovers F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Season article for a club not playing in a fully-professional league. Clearly fails WP:NSEASONS. Was prodded and deleted but restored as a result of this discussion. Similar AfD in September resulted in deletion.

Also nominating: 2012–13 Albion Rovers F.C. season and 2011–12 Albion Rovers F.C. season. Number  5  7  19:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 20:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 20:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick t c s 20:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete all – All three articles fail WP:NSEASONS as none were played in a recognized fully-professional league, and all three fail WP:GNG on their own. As all references appear to be WP:ROUTINE coverage, I don't believe merging them together is appropriate since the resultant article would still likely fail GNG. — Jkudlick t c s 20:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all - fundamental failure of WP:NSEASONS: the club does not play either in a top league, nor a lower tier that is considered a fully professional league. The discussion noted above has clear WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS issues which should not be brought here. In addition to the AfD noted above though, it also notes this AfD and this one which support the notion that there is clear consensus above and beyond the guidelines that non-fully professional clubs do not need their own season articles unless they can be supported by WP:GNG on an article-by-article basis. In the articles above, there are no references that are not routine results reporting. Fenix down (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.