Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 SC Bastia season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

2010–11 SC Bastia season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet NSEASONS since they played in the third division. Sakiv (talk) 02:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sakiv (talk) 02:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment What did a search per WP:BEFORE give you? Championnat National is not a fully professional league but SC Bastia is one of three major Corsican clubs with a large following so I would assume there's a lot of coverage of its matches. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The same could have been said of Deportivo La Coruña, which is more famous than Bastia. The article for the 2020-21 season was deleted for the same reasons when it was relegated to the Segunda División B.--Sakiv (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - in the absence of significant coverage beyond match reports and transfer news. Ping me if sources are found. GiantSnowman 11:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - article expanded with sources which show notability. GiantSnowman 16:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I've added some material covering financial difficulties the club was at the beginning of the season. What do you think? Robby.is.on (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * A step in the right direction, but I'm still not fully convinced I'm afraid. GiantSnowman 15:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, I added another paragraph. Will it suffice? Robby.is.on (talk) 15:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This is not how it works. This will be decided by the community.--Sakiv (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, GS can have his opinion. You have not responded to my question regarding WP:BEFORE above, Sakiv. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Why should Bastia be treated in a different way than La Coruña when relegated to a non-professional division. Their history should have no weight. The nomination is correct and the opinion of GS confirms this.--Sakiv (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I'm not well versed with AfD procedures. But does NSEASONS eliminate the requirement to complete "basic due diligence" to "search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability" (WP:BEFORE)? Robby.is.on (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment The article would need to be improved with sources for it to be a keep. Govvy (talk) 12:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Just a reminder that AFD is not cleanup. --SuperJew (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I have significantly expanded the article's storyline. The citations I included should easily satisfy WP:GNG. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep MEETS GNG, sources have been added and the article has also been expanded. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 17:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG, and 's expansion demonstrates this. --SuperJew (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG, the article has good sources.Pincheira22 (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.