Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 Walking Bout Company season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tjhe sourcing on the article is nowhere near RS standard. Spartaz Humbug! 04:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

2010–11 Walking Bout Company season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. PROD was removed for no apparent reason. Original concern was "This club is not sufficiently notable to have individual season articles." My concerns have not changed. – PeeJay 04:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 04:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - the team is notable enough for an article; the individual season(s) is not. GiantSnowman 13:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I just noticed that the team also has a 2009–10 season article, which should also be deleted. – PeeJay 14:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Has all the needed sources proving each match was accurate and true. Their recent success in league play, as well as performance in international competition is enough to have a season article. I also wouldn't like all the research to make the articles noteworthy go to waste. 72.219.227.230 (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Just because you do a lot of research doesn't make a topic notable. I'm sure all the info is accurate, but we do not need individual season articles for teams in tiny countries like Suriname. – PeeJay 18:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Perhaps if this club had qualified for a competition such as the CONCACAF Champions League, or had a rich history of championships, then there's no reason not to delete it. I wouldn't go ahead and delete it only because it's a club based in Suriname. Twwalter (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not necessary for articles on each season for this club Spiderone  13:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Why not? --Jimbo[online] 01:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no audience for it. There would be no need for season articles for Sutton United would there? Spiderone  08:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * How is there not an audience for it? What proof do you have that no one would ever look at it? What does Sutton United have to do with a club from Suriname? We have season articles on Manchester United? --Jimbo[online] 12:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sutton United is seventh-tier English club. I think it's an understatement to brush off Surinamese first-tier clubs, any first tier club, regardless of location. Twwalter (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Good point. 23:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's suggest an alternative route. This article clearly fails WP:GNG. There is no evidence of large third party coverage. All the juice in this article could easily be put into the main club article, if any juice is present. Spiderone  13:52, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems to be plenty of information regarding results, not a whole lot regarding information of the club itself. Twwalter (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge(?) - Perhaps we could Merge the article with Walking Bout Company? Maybe a subsection under recent history/events? Twwalter (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Would that not make the article a tad recentist.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.