Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010-11 Premier League Full Scorers List


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

2010-11 Premier League Full Scorers List

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I'm not an expert on WP rules, but I believe this comes under NOT — Half  Price  16:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a place for excessive listing of statistics. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  19:54, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Definitely a breach of WP:NOTSTATS. – PeeJay 00:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and PeeJay. I'm also fairly confident that interest would wane somewhere between now and next May and the list would not be completed, rendering it useless -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Argyle 4 Life  talk  10:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Why is this indiscriminate stats but Articles for deletion/List of Turkish football transfers summer 2010 is not? I think NOT#STATS should be deleted. Sandman888 (talk) 10:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - All relevant information is already covered in the main Premier League season article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 19:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator. The relevant info is already covered in the main article. --Carioca (talk) 20:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. GiantSnowman 14:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.