Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 FIFA World Cup (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete under criteria A3 (article was simply devoid of information.) Marasmusine (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

2010 FIFA World Cup (video game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined PROD, WP:CRYSTALBALL. ViperSnake151 20:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The article itself states why: no such game has been confirmed. No sources, poorly written, the article even says no such games has been announced, no sources. Maybe this could be speedy deleted.  TJ   Spyke   20:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The game hasn't be confirmed and there are no sources linking to it. Techman224  Talk  22:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as entirely speculative original research that doesn't assert notability. If it doesn't exist, it shouldn't be noted. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 23:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, just delete. The article was created only a few hours ago; let's not intimidate the newcomer. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 23:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I found a few forum talks on the game but it seems to be mostly a crystal ball issue at this point and no indication if it is in development. Since there is no way to confirm the game i would lean towards deletion unless some sources could be found Ottawa4ever (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Ironholds (talk) 02:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – I trust the above comment that there is even no indication in the development of the game. It's hard to not come off as mean and bite newbies' heads off, especially in cases like this. The verifiability policy I believe trumps the behavioral guideline on biting newbies, and it sucks. MuZemike 07:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm sorry, but I agree with MuZemike. Delete as this is yet another article that takes the "crystal ball" and "in development" claims to their intended levels.  Elm-39 - T/C/N 12:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.