Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Karachi Beechcraft 1900 crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — ξ xplicit  01:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

2010 Karachi Beechcraft 1900 crash

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTNEWS no WP:PERSISTENCE. Charter flight with no notable passengers. ...William 20:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  ...William 20:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -...William 20:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -...William 20:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: multiple news sources to establish notability for the incident. -- lTopGunl (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I do not quite agree with the WP:NOTNEWS argument. This event had coverage in multiple sources, and had a fair bit of fatalities too. Thus, it is clearly not any ordinary incident that can be dismissed by NOTNEWS.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 09:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The incident continues to be notable and is still cited like in October 2011, January 2012. So WP:PERSISTENCE in no way applies here. And about WP:NOTNEWS, I agree with Mar4d. -- S M S  Talk 16:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as a charter flight, this is in a bit of a gray area, but I believe it meets WP:AIRCRASH as a crash of an airliner involving fatalities. Appears to meet WP:GNG as well. (Might want to check again for WP:PERSISTENCE in a couple of years, but for now, I'm leaning keep.) - The Bushranger One ping only 02:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep; it appears to pass the GNG. bobrayner (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.