Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 NAIA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

2010 NAIA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not saying this won't be notable at some point, but aren't we jumping the gun a little here? Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 00:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

At that same point we're only 2 years out, it's not horribly far in advance. And look at the Olympics, they have pages out to 2024, and NCAA has them out to 2011... This is such a small page, it doesn't hurt anyone to have it up there, and it's not crystal balling because it is not predicting any winners or teams that should be there. It is commenting on the tournament bid.Moonraker0022 (talk) 04:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand your concerns, but there are no even confirmed dates at this point. I (personally) just don't see the reason for having a page with a blank bracket and MPV slots for two years, I think any relevant information about the tournament can be covered in the NAIA Division I Basketball Tournament article for the time being, and once more details are finalized, then the article could be recreated. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 04:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * But that is covered by the future sports label. And the brackets are empty, and the honors and awards are empty. There is no presumptive seeding or spectulation on who will win those awards, they are just there because I made a template for the NAIA ones so they would all look similar.Moonraker0022 (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I'll bet this will be closed as keep due to no consensus, because nobody appears to feel really strongly about it either way. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It's just an empty page. In 2010, when we can fill it in, keep. But it doesn't make any sense to keep for two years, does it? I don't think so. Mm  40  Your Hancock Please   —Preceding comment was added at 01:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.