Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Romania military plane crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. (Criterion G4) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

2010 Romania military plane crash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:AIRCRASH. Military flights meet different criteria. Nobody famous on board, no WP:PERSISTENCE
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC) ...William 14:47, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Twelve fatalities is still notable in peacetime, even for a military aircrash. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Second highest number of fatalities in Romania behind this crash.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep There are many news stories (in Romanian language) several months or even years after the event, regarding the causes and the consequences of this plane crash:, , , etc. The fact that the Romanian Air Force stopped using this type of planes after this incident seems important. Razvan Socol (talk) 16:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Removal from inventory was probably NOT as a direct result of the crash. Ageing aircraft, lack of expensive spares or replacement are all far more likely reasons for removal.--Petebutt (talk) 00:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete military training aircraft crash far more often then civil aircraft so tend not to be so notable, I cant see anything particularly in this one for a stand-alone article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MilborneOne (talk • contribs) 20:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Military, small aircraft, at most deserves a paragraph in Antonov An-2 article or Romanian Air Force (Forţele Aeriene Române) article. If Romanian en.wikipedians are offended by this then write the article in Română and post it on --Petebutt (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * We have ro:Accidentul aviatic de la Tuzla, Constanța with more information and more sources than the en.wiki article. Razvan Socol (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you actually think all of us who are voting keep are Romanian? -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: I am not Romanian but the topic is notable. - Ret.Prof (talk) 20:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per category G4. See Articles for deletion/2010 Romanian Air Force Antonov An-2 crash. YSSYguy (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I just tagged the article for speedy deletion and asked a non-involved administrator to take care of it....William 12:30, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.