Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 in Malaysia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

2010 in Malaysia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It's not 2010 yet, too early Cynof  G  avuf 21:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Delete the article lacks even one source, is unfinished and is in violation of WP:CRYSTAL-- Coldplay   Expert  21:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs sourcing, but that's not a valid reason for deletion. 2010 is only 2 months away, and fits in with the other articles in the category Category:2010 by country.  Lugnuts  (talk) 08:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep material will very soon be coming ,and it does no harm to set up a little early.    DGG ( talk ) 00:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per DGG. No crystalball concerns (it seems to me it doesn't predict anything non trivial), useful framework. -- Cycl o pia talk  01:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep The article needs considerable work in every way, and even though it fails WP:NOTCRYSTAL point #2, just take a look at what they did with (and note the number of sources on) 2009 in Malaysia. They're even using 2010 in Malaysia for a practical purpose right now. And as Lugnuts pointed out above, 2010 is reasonably almost upon us. Oh, and one last thing... this is my first post on AfD ever. ;)  FFLaguna (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep "It's not 2010 yet, too early". I think that maybe we should revisit this one in a couple of months, see what happens, and if it still isn't 2010 by that time, then definitely a delete.  Mandsford (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.