Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Andorra helicopter crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

2011 Andorra helicopter crash

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:NOTNEWS. Accident has some coverage (all in French with some of them in Catalan) but fails WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Event doesn't demonstrate lasting effects and fails the event criteria. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 02:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

* Keep - so with your logic, most flights with articles ex. Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 should be deleted because it doesn't have any continued coverage? I would've said delete if there was less deaths but since this accident was relatively old, i say just leave but help clean up the article (grammar, punctuation, date, etc). — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeekyAviation (talk • contribs) 03:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Would the nominated article fall under criterion G5 of speedy deletion since the page creator, 78NewX, is a suspected sockpuppet? Aviationwikiflight (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * not suspected as he is already confirmed one but there is nothing wrong with the page (silly edits), just needs more information and fixed grammar GeekyAviation (talk) 02:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter whether the page has anything wrong with it, the article hasn't been substantially edited which means that this article probably falls under criterion G5 of speedy deletion. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 03:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Per the user page:
 * This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Ryan kirkpatrick (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
 * Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Whether or not Flight 708 should be included is another discussion.
 * From the inclusion criteria:
 * Events are probably notable if they have enduring historical significance and meet the general notability guideline, or if they have a significant lasting effect. Barely meets the criterion
 * Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards (as described below).
 * Events having lesser coverage or more limited scope may or may not be notable; the descriptions below provide guidance to assess the event.
 * Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance.
 * Already fails nearly all four of the criteria.
 * Recommendations REC 48/13 and 49/13 were all issued to the operator, so whilst these may have improved the operator's safety, nationwide or internationally, the accident did not have major lasting effects. Final Report
 * Since 2011, there hasn't been any news surrounding the event failing WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 03:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation,  and Andorra.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Since 2011, there hasn't been any news surrounding the event failing WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 03:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation,  and Andorra.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as per nomination. -Samoht27 (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.