Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Lokpal bill drafting committee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

2011 Lokpal bill drafting committee

 * – ( View AfD View log )

More than one editor(s) have established that the topic of this article may not meet the general notability guideline, including myself. This can surely be merged into a different article; I don't see why this lone page should exist as a separate article. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 10:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Note that from 8 April to 12 April, article was redirected, so AfD was not visible at that time. I have reverted the redirect until this discussion can run to completion. I'll try to pop back in with my opinion after reading and looking for sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * delete - Cited sources are news reports about who will lead this committee -a committee of the Lok Sabha. At this point, fails general notability guideline --Whiteguru (talk) 23:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Jan Lokpal Bill is huge (and important) news in India, and we already have an article on it. Any details on its drafting can and should be in that article. This article is not needed and doesn't even merit a redirect. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 06:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete/Merge: The committee members can and should be liste at Jan Lokpal Bill. I can imagine a circumstance in the future where this should be spun back out as an independent article (say, for instance, the committee itself becomes the focus of sustained coverage independent of the Bill itself), but that's unlikely and in any event should not occur until independent notability can be established.  Qwyrxian (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.