Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Martyr's Memorial C-Division League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, but Keep the additional entries pending a new AfD. Black Kite (talk) 23:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

2011 Martyr's Memorial C-Division League

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable sports league. Primarily single sourced. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC) Also nominating:


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 05:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only was it a non-notable sports league as per nom, the article is about the season rather than the league (I find no article for the league). The league apparently existed only for the one season. If the article was about the league rather than the season, I might possibly consider, if further information were available. Jacona (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Removing my vote as this was a single-artice AfD when I started and is now something else; I have not researched the other articles. I may or may not get back to this.Jacona (talk)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 20:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all as they all fail WP:GNG. And I'm sure we deleted some Martyr's Memorial League articles before (presumably for another division), with almost unanimous support. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have reverted the nominator's attempt to bundle more articles into this AFD after discussions had begun and people had made their !votes. GiantSnowman 19:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Tagging all users who voted before additional similar articles were added. @Jacona @GiantSnowman Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Again - why are you attempting to bundle after discussion has begun, and why have you mis-used rollback in reverting my edits? GiantSnowman 21:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They should have been bundled straight away, but can't we just leave it be now? All the articles are seasons of the same tournament, so one AFD on them is sensible, and multiple AFDs is just bureaucratic. Especially as there were only 2 votes beforehand, one of those people is going to re-evaluate their vote later. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * All should be deleted, but the principle remains - do not bundle after discussion has started, and do not abuse rollback to restore your botched edits. I am still waiting for an explanation and apology from . GiantSnowman 09:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural Close - This AfD is horribly flawed. It started as one article and in the midst of the discussion was changed to encompass 4 others, rendering all previous discussion invalid. It needs to be closed as no consensus and reopened properly.Jacona (talk) 09:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * They are articles of the same tournament with the same non notability. If people really object so much, remove them from this discussion and start a separate AFD. But WP:NOTBURO applies here, because people are just trying to force needless bureaucracy when they are clearly very similar articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * you’re right it’s procedural. Just like not editing talk page comments after a discussion is procedural. My previous delete vote was changed behind my back to include 4 other articles I had not had a chance to look at. That’s not WP:CIVILJacona (talk) 12:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You were tagged and notified that 4 other articles were added to the nomination. At this point you can change/keep your vote or explain a withdrawal of a vote. Your suggestion of closing this AFD and opening new ones is just plain a waste of time and full of bureaucracy which is not needed here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I was tagged, fortunately, (not by you). If I had been off-wiki it would appear that I voted for something I hadn’t even looked at. So perhaps you could consider something other than self-righteous indignation.Jacona (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure if you can see, but I tagged you right above. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I fully agree with here - the conduct of  here, in adding FOUR other articles to the AFD after discussions had already started, and then mis-using rollback when they were reverted, is awful. I ask the closing/reviewing admin to ignore the bundled articles at this AFD. GiantSnowman 11:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.