Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Pan American Games medal table


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was retracted and speedy-closed, consensus to redirect. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

2011 Pan American Games medal table

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Useless stub article containing a blank medal table for a sports competition that hasn't been held yet. It will no doubt become legitimate once the event has happened, but until then it is quite useless. I tried redirecting it for the time being, but the article creator is edit-warring it back. Deletion without prejudice to recreation or speedy restoration once it can be filled with actual data. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:21, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * REDIRECT if there is no compromise to keep. I am against deleting, precedent already set in 2008 Summer Olympics medal table and 2010 Winter Olympics medal table that redirecting is acceptable. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect Be bold and do it. No need for this AfD.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:29, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep there is information that lists the sports that will have two bronze medals awarded, which is not present on the main page. Also considering the event is less then four months why delete it? When it needs to be recreated again. Plus I am not edit warring, as edit warring is considered reverting four edits within 24 hours. I reverted one edit, after explaining yo why the article should stay. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions   12:32, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Incorrect. It says on WP:EW that, "The three revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of what "edit warring" means, and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three revert rule, or even coming close to doing so." — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 17:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh I understand, but reverting one edit with an explanation counts as edit warring? Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions   19:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Officially redirected. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions   19:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, if we can agree on a redirect, I'll happily retract this nomination. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.