Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Premier Arena Soccer League summer season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

2011 Premier Arena Soccer League summer season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Multi-article nomination, all fails WP:NSEASONS and WP:GNG. Typically, the only seasons articles that pass WP:GNG are for fully professional leagues, which these leagues are not. Note one similar article was previously deleted here, and there was a discussion started here about it Joseph2302 (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Added many related season articles to the nomination, will tag them all appropriately. And will inform WT:FOOTY of this discussion. Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete all per AFD consensus. GiantSnowman 16:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom, I find it odd how this is any different from 1985–86 South Midlands League, that wasn't professional at all, GNG wasn't met. I think people have lost priorities. Govvy (talk) 17:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all WISL - I need to look into the PASL ones a bit more but I've done some searches for coverage of individual matches in the WISL and not managed to find anything other than their own Wordpress site and their own Facebook page, which badly fails our standards for sourcing and notability Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all There are not enough sources to meet WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 18:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all No evidence the articles are notable. Eldumpo (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all No trainwreck here, there's not a shred of notability here. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom  Devoke  water  19:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.