Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 QAFL reserves season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to 2011 NEAFL season selectively. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

2011 QAFL reserves season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG: references are all database or WP:ROUTINE coverage by non-independent sources (e.g. the league, the clubs within it, and the online database where scores are entered. This also fails any reasonable 'pub test' of notability: it's a routine season article for a league which itself has no article and – as the reserves league for an already fairly minor competition – would also fail GNG. Aspirex (talk) 07:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment What if it was merged into 2011 NEAFL season (with a lot of info taken out)? When the VFA/L reserves existed, for instance, those results were referenced on the main senior season page. These were reserves for 7/17 NEAFL clubs that season Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 09:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football,  and Australia. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  16:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge makes sense and is fine with me.
 * SportingFlyer  T · C  16:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I would still delete, even after merging any salient points. I don't believe "2011 QAFL reserves season" is a likely search for anyone seeking this information.  Aspirex (talk) 05:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not even convinced individual NEAFL seniors seasons are notable, let alone reserves seasons! – Teratix ₵ 08:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – Clearly fails on WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect and selective merge to 2011 NEAFL season as a reasonable ATD. Fails GNG and lacks notability as a standalone article.  Frank   Anchor  14:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Can the editors advocating a merger please explain more clearly exactly what material they believe should be merged? Most 2011 NEAFL clubs did not even field teams in this competition. – Teratix ₵ 15:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think the prose background about how the QAFL and ACTAFL came together and what happened to the minor grade structures when that occurred is relevant for merge (as long as the equivalent info is added for how it happened in Canberra). That's probably all I'd merge - I'm not sure it would be right to merge any of the results across, that would be like including VFL results on an AFL season page. Aspirex (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Nuke From wikipedia, reserve seasons don't even qualify under WP:NSEASONS, you can have some reserve stuff on a top season article, but not an article about a reserve team season, that's just overkill on data for wikipedia. Govvy (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  14:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.