Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in music (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

2011 in music
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Disambiguation page with nothing but redlinks, all about music in 2011. There's really no reason why the page can't wait until there's something to disambiguate. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Alex (talk) 07:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Until we actually have those articles, this page is unnecessary. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  14:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I know this page doesn't look like much, but look upon the 2009 in music page or previous years. They are disasters - overcrowded, in need of rewrites, and are filled with primarily US-bias. I set out to create this page to clean up later years, and I wish the standard set by the 2010 in television pages and this hopeful page becomes the norm. My goal is to clean this up. How well I do now depends on those who vandilise this page or the administrator who hasn't seen the 2009 in music page. (99.37.53.244 (talk) 16:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC))
 * Everything that you said will be fine when the time comes, but nothing that you said indicates why the page should exist before there is information for it to contain. Your goal is admirable, but if I may say so, you are trying to exert a measure of control that you don't possess. To that end, though, you might want to look into whether creating a WP:WikiProject would serve your purpose. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I've re-formatted 2010 in music to fit this same standard, and it looks much better. I do not believe I should have created this page at this point - it is too soon. (Tigerghost (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC))
 * In that case, as the article's author, you can have the article speedily deleted by placing the template db-author at the top of the page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 17:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. 2010 doesn't even exist yet. By definition this article can be nothing but speculation for a long time. Wikpedia is not a crystal ball. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 19:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * DeleteI disagree with the comment above, this article does not speculate about future events, and hence is not acting like a crystal ball. Nevertheless, it is simply too early to create this article - we can't just go on creating similar articles full of red links for every tear to come ! We'll have this article when we need it, which is some time away. Rkr 1991  (Wanna chat?) 13:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, really. Drmies (talk) 16:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not nearly enough known about next year's musical scenes yet to even consider the need for such an article. --A1octopus (talk) 22:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.